Linguistics· 2026Q1
Phonological integration of borrowings in Namibian German: language variation and social meaning in a postcolonial context
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Namibian German speakers integrate borrowings phonologically at nearly every feature, with stylized use and male gender increasing integration likelihood, suggesting metalinguistic ideas about prototypical language tied to settler-colonial ancestry.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Nearly all phonological features of borrowings in Namibian German show variation between non-integrated and integrated forms.
- Stylized language use and male speaker gender significantly increase the likelihood of phonological integration.
- Phonological integration is linked to metalinguistic ideas about prototypical Namibian German, connected to settler-colonial ancestry.
- Urban adolescents' non-integration of clicks may signal Pan-Namibian urban pluralism.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates how speakers of Namibian German, a vital minority language in present-day Namibia, phonologically adapt borrowings. A quantitative study of spoken data from the corpus DNam reveals that nearly every examined phonological feature varies between phonologically non-integrated (e.g., Afrikaans [ə͜ʊ] kie ‘guy’) and integrated forms (e.g., [oː] kie or [a͜ʊ] kie ). A multifactorial regression model shows that different factors significantly increase the likelihood of phonological integration, such as stylized language use and male speaker gender. The statistical results suggest that phonological integration pertains to metalinguistic ideas about prototypical Namibian German language use, which relate to auto-stereotypes that are rooted in the community’s settler-colonial ancestry, with implications for the construction of gender. Urban adolescent speakers’ articulation (i.e., non-integration) of clicks, on the other hand, possibly serves as an index of specifically Pan-Namibian urban pluralism. The interpretations find preliminary support in additional qualitative observations, such as metalinguistic comments by speakers of Namibian German. While some interpretations take the shape of new hypotheses, I argue that the findings in this paper do provide a glimpse into how postcolonial categories factor into the linguistic construction of social meaning, and how the study of socially meaningful language variation may contribute to an anthropological understanding of postcolonial contexts.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Linguistics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Linguistics and Language
Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences