PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Social Psychology of Education· 2026Q1

It doesn’t always have to be this way: promoting girls’ interest in STEM through growth mindsets and structural explanations of gender differences

Allison Master, Kahyun Lee, Shaila Sharmin, Daijiazi Tang et al.

Short summary

A growth mindset intervention showed some evidence of increasing 6th and 8th grade girls' motivation in computer science, while a structural explanation intervention for 11- and 12-year-old girls dampened stereotypes but did not increase STEM interest.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A growth mindset intervention showed some positive effects on girls' motivation in computer science.
  • Teaching girls about structural explanations for gender differences reduced stereotypes.
  • Belief in the malleability of STEM interest and ability was promoted by structural explanations.
  • Neither intervention consistently increased girls' interest in STEM activities across all measures.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Gender gaps in motivation for STEM fields emerge at an early age and generally persist as children become older. Viewing these gender differences in motivation as malleable rather than fixed or inherent may reduce stereotyping and promote girls’ motivation in STEM. The current paper reports findings from two preregistered experimental intervention studies. These interventions targeted girls’ beliefs about stability (Study 1) and external attributions for gender differences (Study 2). Study 1 ( N = 381) examined whether a growth mindset intervention could increase Grade 6 and 8 students’ motivation for computer science. There was some evidence that girls in the intervention condition reported higher motivation on some outcomes, and exploratory findings further confirmed the importance of girls’ motivational beliefs. Study 2 ( N = 220) examined whether teaching 11- and 12-year-old girls about external, structural explanations for gender differences could influence their interest in a novel STEM activity. Exploratory results showed that structural explanations dampened gender stereotypes and also promoted belief in the malleability of STEM interest; effects on girls’ motivation were not found. Beliefs that interest and abilities in STEM are malleable may be helpful but not sufficient to foster girls’ own motivation in STEM.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Social Psychology of Education, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyPsychology