PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Academy of Management Journal· 2012Q1

Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Nonfamily Firms: Behavioral Agency and Myopic Loss Aversion Perspectives

James J. Chrisman, Pankaj C. Patel

Short summary

Family firms exhibit greater variability in R&D investments than nonfamily firms, particularly when performance falls below aspiration levels, at which point their investments increase and become less variable.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Family firms generally invest less in R&D than nonfamily firms.
  • Family firms display greater variability in their R&D investments compared to nonfamily firms.
  • When performance is below aspiration levels, family firms' R&D investments increase and become less variable relative to nonfamily firms.
  • Analysis of 964 firms from the Standard & Poor's 1500 between 1998 and 2007 supports these hypotheses.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The behavioral agency model suggests that to preserve socioemotional wealth, loss-averse family firms usually invest less in R&D than nonfamily firms. However, behavioral agency model predictions are inconsistent with the well-accepted premise that family firms have a long-term investment orientation. We reconcile these seemingly incompatible predictions by adding insights from the myopic loss aversion framework, which deals with the impact of decision-making time horizons. The combination of these two prospect theory derivatives led us to hypothesize that family firms usually invest less in R&D than nonfamily firms but the variability of their investments will be greater owing to differences in the compatibility of long- and short-term family goals with the economic goals of a firm. However, when performance is below aspiration levels, we theorize that family goals and economic goals tend to converge. In this situation, the R&D investments of family firms are expected to increase and the variability of those investments decrease, relative to nonfamily firms. Analysis of 964 publicly held family and nonfamily firms from the Standard & Poor's 1500 between 1998 and 2007 support our hypotheses, confirming a need to take the heterogeneity of family firms more fully into account.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Academy of Management Journal, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting