PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Professional Capital and Community· 2026Q1

Culturally and linguistically adaptive AI and professional capital among language educators

Mohsen Mahmoudi-Dehaki, Nasim Nasr-Esfahani

Short summary

A multiple-case study of 48 language educators in Iran, India, and rural East Africa found that culturally and linguistically adaptive AI platforms enhanced professional capital: 85% used pedagogical feedback (human capital), 75% engaged with peer feedback (social capital), and 92% accessed analytics (decisional capital).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Adaptive AI platforms positively influenced human, social, and decisional capital among 48 language educators in multilingual, under-resourced settings.
  • 85% of educators engaged with context-aware pedagogical feedback features, enhancing human capital.
  • 75% utilized peer-feedback features, strengthening social capital through collaboration.
  • 92% accessed analytic summaries, contributing to decisional capital.
  • Professional capital emerged from the interaction of adaptive AI, sociocultural context, and infrastructural conditions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Purpose This study explores how culturally and linguistically adaptive artificial intelligence (AI) systems align with patterns of professional capital—human, social, and decisional—among language educators in under-resourced, multilingual contexts. It examines how educators' engagement with the AI platform relates to knowledge development, collaborative networks, and instructional decision-making while considering infrastructural constraints and equity challenges. Design/methodology/approach A qualitatively driven multiple-case study involving 48 language educators (16 per region) from Iran, India, and rural Kenya/Tanzania was conducted. Data from semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and AI platform logs documenting feedback, collaboration and analytics were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis in NVivo. AI platform log data contextualized qualitative interpretations rather than testing statistical relationships. Triangulation, member checking and reflexive journaling supported the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings. Findings Educators' engagement with the AI platform aligned with patterns of professional capital across three dimensions: human capital through context-aware pedagogical feedback (85% engaged with feedback features), social capital through peer collaboration (75% engaged with peer-feedback features) and decisional capital through access to analytic summaries (92% accessed analytics features). Qualitative findings further suggested that professional capital emerged through the interaction of adaptive AI, sociocultural context, and infrastructural conditions. Originality/value This study contributes empirical insights into the application of professional capital theory within AI-supported professional learning in multilingual and under-resourced educational settings. By highlighting the interaction between adaptive AI design and sociocultural contexts, the study advances understanding of culturally responsive AI integration and offers practical implications for developing more equitable, resilient, and context-responsive learning environments.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Computer Science Applications

Computer Science ApplicationsComputer Science