PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Japanese Studies· 2026Q2

Fraught Narratives, Contrived Futures: Tokyo’s Techno-Utopian Erasure of the Unhoused

Paul Christensen

Short summary

Advocacy groups for Tokyo's unhoused offer a more humane, dignity-oriented future than government initiatives that promote techno-utopian visions and consumerist solutions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Tokyo's government initiatives promote techno-utopian visions and consumerist solutions for social and economic concerns.
  • Advocacy organizations for the unhoused offer a more humane, dignity-oriented future.
  • Ethnographic fieldwork with groups like Nojiren, Tenohasi, and Sanyukai contrasts grassroots efforts with top-down narratives.
  • Community-driven efforts are presented as a more inclusive and emancipatory path forward.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Mirai – future – is ubiquitously written into Tokyo’s cityscape. Yet the promises embedded in future-oriented government initiatives like Health Japan 21, Innovation 25, Society 5.0, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), reveal a growing disconnect between techno-utopian visions and lived realities. Here I explore this tension by examining how advocacy organizations for Tokyo’s unhoused provide a more humane, dignity-oriented future, challenging the consumerist and techno-utopian solutions offered by official initiatives. Through ethnographic fieldwork with Nojiren, Tenohasi, and Sanyukai – groups aiding Tokyo’s unhoused – I contrast grassroots efforts with government-driven narratives that promote an idealized ‘future past’, where nostalgia and promises of technological progress serve as a weakening panacea for social and economic concerns. These top-down efforts, designed to reassure an aging population facing economic uncertainty, often obscure the immediate struggles many face. By highlighting the work of advocacy groups, I argue that smaller-scale, community-driven efforts offer a more inclusive, emancipatory, and compassionate path forward.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Japanese Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Cultural Studies

Cultural StudiesSocial Sciences