Healthcare· 2026Q1· Review
“Managing the Binder”: A Systematic Review of the Burdens Experienced by Patients and Carers in Managing Personal Health Information Across Fragmented Healthcare Systems
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A systematic review of 11 studies found that patients and carers experience significant burdens managing personal health information (PHI) across fragmented healthcare systems, with paper-based methods remaining common due to their visibility and portability.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Patients and carers manage medications, appointments, test results, and more using various methods, including folders, binders, notes, and digital portals.
- Reported burdens include significant time, administrative effort, cognitive demand, emotional distress, and responsibility for continuity of care.
- Burdens are amplified when increased information demands coincide with reduced patient capacity.
- Paper-based systems are common due to their visibility, portability, and ease of annotation.
- No study directly evaluated whether digital interventions effectively reduce PHI management burden.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background: Fragmented healthcare systems require patients and informal carers to collect, organise, transfer, and interpret personal health information across providers. This review examined the burdens of this work, its management methods, and the evidence for digital tools intended to reduce it. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English-language primary studies published from January 2000 to 25 June 2026. Eligible studies examined patient- or carer-led management of personal health information in community, outpatient, or longitudinal care. Two reviewers independently screened records. The findings were synthesised narratively because of study heterogeneity. Results: Eleven studies published between 2005 and 2021 were included: seven from the United States, two from Italy, and one from Canada and Israel each. Ten used qualitative methods and one used mixed methods. Patients and carers managed medications, appointments, test results, correspondence, medical histories, and insurance information using folders, binders, handwritten notes, calendars, spreadsheets, memory, and, less commonly, digital portals. Reported burdens included time, administrative effort, cognitive demand, emotional distress, and responsibility for maintaining continuity between services. Burdens were greatest when information demands increased while illness reduced a patient’s capacity to manage them. Paper-based systems remained common because they were visible, portable, and easy to annotate. No study directly tested whether a digital intervention reduced information management burden, and none were conducted in Australia. Conclusions: Personal health information management (PHIM) is substantial but largely unrecognised patient and carer work arising partly from fragmented information exchange. The available evidence identifies design considerations for information management, but it does not establish that digital interventions can reduce burden.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Healthcare, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Health Information Management
Health Information ManagementHealth Professions