Millennial Asia· 2026Q1
Rural Labour Transitions in Punjab: Determinants, Segmentation and Change
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Rural non-farm employment in Punjab is growing but highly unequal, with opportunities varying by social group, gender, assets, and location.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Rural non-farm employment in Punjab is expanding but access is unequal across social groups, gender, assets, and locations.
- Ludhiana offers more sustainable non-farm jobs due to its urbanized, industry-focused development.
- Fazilka's non-farm sector primarily provides income sustenance.
- The pandemic-induced economic downturn pushed many workers, especially those from deprived groups with low education, back into agriculture.
- Economic shocks have unevenly impacted livelihoods, exacerbating existing inequalities in non-farm sector access.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article examines the growth of rural non-farm employment in the light of changing employment patterns in Punjab. To understand the processes and underlying determinants, the study uses secondary (Periodic Labour Force Surveys) and primary data collected from 200 rural households in two economically diverse districts of Punjab—Ludhiana and Fazilka. In addition, a follow-up survey was conducted, covering 133 of these households, to examine the changes in rural employment after 5 years. The analysis finds that rural households were significantly participating in the rural non-farm sector; however, the emerging opportunities remain highly unequal across social groups, gender, asset positions and locations. Due to an urbanized setting and more industry-based development in Ludhiana, non-farm employment was found to be relatively sustainable in nature, whereas it proved to be a source of income sustenance in Fazilka. However, in the pretext of the pandemic-led economic downturn, a large proportion of workers, especially socially deprived with low levels of education, joined back agricultural work. Further, the impact of economic shock has been uneven, varying widely across social groups, gender and educational levels. Thus, the loss of livelihood and income levels has halted the process of structural transformation and exacerbated the existing inequalities in access to non-farm sector opportunities.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Millennial Asia, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological SciencesAgricultural and Biological Sciences