BMC Medical Education· 2026Q1
Cross-national clinical exchange in child psychiatry across cultural contexts and mental health systems: a scoping review
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A scoping review of 3 studies found that cross-national clinical exchange programs in child psychiatry increase awareness of how culture and care systems shape clinical practice.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Cross-national clinical exchange in child psychiatry increases awareness of cultural and care system influences on practice.
- A review identified 3 studies from the US, India, and the Netherlands on these exchange programs.
- Benefits include recognizing differences/similarities and professional development.
- Evidence is limited, suggesting a need for further research on effectiveness and optimal formats.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Background Clinical practice in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) relies on internationally shared, empirically grounded guidelines, yet their application is influenced by socioeconomic and cultural differences. Cross-national clinical exchange allows health professionals to learn from similarities and differences. The objective of this scoping review was to map cross-national clinical exchange in CAP and summarise reported benefits, challenges, and impacts on clinical practice. Methods This scoping review was conducted in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for publications between January 2015 and October 2025. Eligible records involved clinicians, trainees, or teams engaged in cross-national expertise exchange within CAP (0–18 years). Findings were synthesised thematically. Results After deduplication, 1,944 records were identified. Twenty-one full text articles were assessed. Three studies were included from the United States, India and the Netherlands. Main themes show that exchange programmes result in awareness of differences and similarities; recognition of the interactions between clinical practice, culture, and mental health care services; and professional development. Conclusions Evidence is limited, but pilot programmes suggest cross-national exchanges increase awareness of culture and care system organisation shaping clinical practice. Further research should assess the added value, cost-effectiveness, and which formats work best for whom. Trial registration This review was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF): https://osf.io/pqm3t/ .
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Medical Education, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Social Psychology
Social PsychologyPsychology