The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· 2013Q1
MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012
- 1,091citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2013year
Short summary
A systematic review of 45 peer-reviewed papers (2008-2012) reveals MOOC literature categorizes into eight areas: introductory, concept, case studies, educational theory, technology, participant-focused, provider-focused, and other.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Identified and reviewed 45 peer-reviewed papers on MOOCs from 2008-2012.
- Categorized MOOC literature into eight distinct areas of interest.
- Provided quantitative analysis of publication types, years, and contributors.
- Explored future research directions based on identified gaps in the literature.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
<p>Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are a recent addition to the range of online learning options. Since 2008, MOOCs have been run by a variety of public and elite universities, especially in North America. Many academics have taken interest in MOOCs recognising the potential to deliver education around the globe on an unprecedented scale; some of these academics are taking a research-oriented perspective and academic papers describing their research are starting to appear in the traditional media of peer reviewed publications. This paper presents a systematic review of the published MOOC literature (2008-2012): Forty-five peer reviewed papers are identified through journals, database searches, searching the Web, and chaining from known sources to form the base for this review. We believe this is the first effort to systematically review literature relating to MOOCs, a fairly recent but massively popular phenomenon with a global reach. The review categorises the literature into eight different areas of interest, introductory, concept, case studies, educational theory, technology, participant focussed, provider focussed, and other, while also providing quantitative analysis of publications according to publication type, year of publication, and contributors. Future research directions guided by gaps in the literature are explored.</p>
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2013 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Computer Science Applications
Computer Science ApplicationsComputer Science