PofoliaShared via Pofolia

IEEE Transactions on Computers· 2013Q1

Fault Analysis-Based Logic Encryption

Jeyavijayan Rajendran, Huan Zhang, Chi Zhang, Garrett S. Rose et al.

Short summary

A new logic encryption technique uses fault propagation analysis to ensure wrong keys corrupt IC outputs, achieving a targeted 50% Hamming distance with fewer added gates than random insertion.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Logic encryption technique based on fault propagation analysis.
  • Ensures wrong keys corrupt IC outputs.
  • Targets 50% Hamming distance between correct and wrong outputs.
  • Requires fewer additional gates than random logic encryption.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Globalization of the integrated circuit (IC) design industry is making it easy for rogue elements in the supply chain to pirate ICs, overbuild ICs, and insert hardware Trojans. Due to supply chain attacks, the IC industry is losing approximately $4 billion annually. One way to protect ICs from these attacks is to encrypt the design by inserting additional gates such that correct outputs are produced only when specific inputs are applied to these gates. The state-of-the-art logic encryption technique inserts gates randomly into the design, but does not necessarily ensure that wrong keys corrupt the outputs. Our technique ensures that wrong keys corrupt the outputs. We relate logic encryption to fault propagation analysis in IC testing and develop a fault analysis-based logic encryption technique. This technique enables a designer to controllably corrupt the outputs. Specifically, to maximize the ambiguity for an attacker, this technique targets 50% Hamming distance between the correct and wrong outputs (ideal case) when a wrong key is applied. Furthermore, this 50% Hamming distance target is achieved using a smaller number of additional gates when compared to random logic encryption.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hardware and Architecture

Hardware and ArchitectureComputer Science