CoDesign· 2014Q1
Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning
- 986citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2014year
Short summary
This paper identifies and categorizes three distinct approaches to 'making' in codesign: cultural probes, generative toolkits, and design prototypes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Identifies three key approaches to making in codesign: cultural probes, generative toolkits, and design prototypes.
- Distinguishes between 'designing for people' and 'designing with people' as mindsets in codesign.
- Explores variations in design intent, including provoking, engaging, and serving.
- Frames 'making' as a method for both designers and non-designers to make sense of and shape the future.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
AbstractThe role of making in the design process has been growing, taking on new forms and involving new players over the past 10 years. Where we once primarily saw designers using making to give shape to the future, today we can see designers and non-designers working together, using making as a way to make sense of the future. In this paper, we describe the landscape of design research and practice at the end of 2013 with special attention to the role of making across these perspectives: approach (cultural probes, generative toolkits and design prototypes), mindset (designing for people and designing with people), focus in time (the world as it is, the near future and the speculative future) as well as variations in design intent (provoking, engaging and serving).Keywords:: designcodesignmakingcultural probesprototypesgenerative toolkitsservice designdesign fictionfuture AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank the contributors to this special issue for engaging in a dialogue about codesigning through making, which allowed us to benefit from their views on the matter, and to our colleagues and students who gave feedback on earlier drafts of this paper. We would also like to thank Janet McDonnell for her encouragement and timely feedback on this special issue.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. CoDesign, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Human-Computer Interaction
Human-Computer InteractionComputer Science