Neohelicon· 2026Q1
“I’m talking about here and now”: self-reflexivity, history, and climate futures in contemporary lecture plays
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Contemporary lecture plays by Sabrina Mahfouz and Stephen Emmott use self-reflexive performance and historical narratives to project climate futures, with Mahfouz's work offering a more nuanced, marginalized perspective compared to Emmott's Eurocentric, deterministic view.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Lecture plays by Mahfouz and Emmott utilize self-reflexive performance to explore the climate crisis.
- Both plays employ historical narratives to project future climate scenarios, relying on self-reflexive framing for credibility.
- Emmott's 'Ten Billion' presents a deterministic, Eurocentric view of climate change based on population growth, undermining its authority.
- Mahfouz's 'A History of Water' integrates personal and community histories, challenging objective historical accounts and reframing futures from the margins.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Sabrina Mahfouz’s A History of Water in the Middle East begins with a self-reflexive passage that establishes the play’s peculiar form, a lecture. Her choice of aesthetic frame and discussion of climate change resonate with an earlier such lecture play at the Royal Court, Stephen Emmott’s Ten Billion . Both authors perform their own work, transposing the lecture performance into the theatre, which, I argue, enables a highly subjective and self-reflexive investigation of political and social origins of the climate crisis. Additionally, both use narrations of the past to project future climate scenarios which rely on self-reflexive framing to gain credibility and are based on (or complicate) the prevalent temporal metaphor of the line. Ten Billion focuses on a global history of rapid population increase to explain resource overuse and the resulting change in climate. Emmott’s self-identification as leading scientist lends institutional authority to his lecture play but his account of seemingly objective and universal climate data is undermined by his reliance on a habitual Eurocentric position that cannot account for local difference. His projection that existing measures will inevitably fail to address the climate crisis precludes positive engagement towards sustainability. In contrast, Mahfouz tells her own story alongside her community’s account of British imperial history, challenging supposedly objective, institutionalised versions of that history. Her play leans more fully into the self-reflexive potential of the form, complicating such straightforward temporal extrapolations as Emmott’s and re-framing imagined futures from the margins.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Neohelicon, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Literature and Literary Theory
Literature and Literary TheoryArts and Humanities