postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies· 2026Q2
‘The worst of all Turkish peoples’: Ibn Faḍlān’s travel account as British naval intelligence
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A 1918 British military intelligence document reinterpreted Ibn Faḍlān's tenth-century account of the Bāshghird people, framing it as naval intelligence and an authoritative judgment on an 'Orientalized other'.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A 1918 British military intelligence document treated Ibn Faḍlān's tenth-century travel account as naval intelligence.
- The document recontextualized Ibn Faḍlān's descriptions of the Bāshghird people.
- Ibn Faḍlān's account was used to make authoritative judgments on an 'Orientalized other'.
- The analysis combines British imperial political thought with Volga-Ural local historical writing.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract The tenth-century CE Arabic travel account of Aḥmad Ibn Faḍlān has seen many reactions, receptions, and afterlives in Islamicate languages and in European settings. These relate both to the identity and presumed authority of Ibn Faḍlān as an eyewitness observer and presumed diplomat, and to the contents of his account. Considering different presentations of Ibn Faḍlān’s role and identity, this article approaches reactions to and uses of Ibn Faḍlān’s descriptions of the Bāshghird, particularly within a 1918 British military intelligence document, in order to consider Ibn Faḍlān’s potential as an imperial agent who could make authoritative and lasting judgements on an Orientalized other. Drawing on a combination of British imperial political thought and Volga-Ural local historical writing, descriptions of the Bāshghird by Ibn Faḍlān are weighed against Sara Ahmed’s reflections on ethnographic authority.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Anthropology
AnthropologySocial Sciences