PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Information· 2026Q2

A Reproducible Framework for Monitoring and Forecasting Regional Morbidity in Kazakhstan Using Harmonized Annual Official Statistics

Zhanar Oralbekova, Zhaniya Karabayeva, Marzhan Turarova, Natalya Demidchik et al.

Short summary

A novel framework combining official statistics with a hybrid forecasting model (last-observation + Extra Trees residual correction) reduced mean absolute error (MAE) by 1.93% for regional morbidity in Kazakhstan (1344 observations, 2012-2025).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A framework was developed to forecast and monitor regional morbidity in Kazakhstan using harmonized official statistics.
  • The selected forecasting model combines last-observation with Extra Trees residual correction and lagged predictors.
  • The hybrid model reduced pooled mean absolute error (MAE) by 1.93% (163.65 vs. 166.87) compared to the last-observation forecast.
  • The hybrid approach improved accuracy in four of six disease classes.
  • SHAP values were used to decompose the complete forecast.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This study evaluates a reproducible framework for forecasting and retrospective monitoring of regional morbidity in Kazakhstan using harmonized annual official statistics. Ministry of Healthcare compendia were combined with demographic and living-standards tables from the Bureau of National Statistics. The panel comprises 1344 observations for 2012–2025 across 16 stable territories and six disease classes. Forty-two primary forecasting configurations and two sensitivity configurations were evaluated using expanding-window one-year-ahead validation, with selection based on 2017–2024 forecasts. Results for 2025 are exploratory because the outcome was inspected during model development. The selected specification combines the last-observation forecast with an Extra Trees residual correction, core lagged predictors, and a shrinkage weight selected within earlier temporal folds. Pooled mean absolute error (MAE) was 163.65 vs. 166.87 for the last-observation forecast, a 1.93% reduction; 2025 values were 108.05 and 110.69. The exact year-block test yielded a one-sided p-value of 0.066 and a familywise-adjusted p-value of 0.387. The hybrid reduced MAE in four of six disease classes. Grouped Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) decomposed the complete forecast. Monitoring used absolute error relative to preceding MAE; the categories are retrospective aids and were not validated against clinical outcomes or interventions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Information, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Demography

DemographySocial Sciences