PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Construction Management and Economics· 2026Q1

Age-group perspectives on large language models in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry: usage patterns, adoption expectations, trust, and future outlook

Andrew Park, Oscar Poudel, Zeyu Wu, Mohamad Awada et al.

Short summary

AEC professionals aged 18-42 report higher LLM familiarity and use than older counterparts, though perceived usefulness is similar across age groups. Younger professionals prioritize field support, while all groups favor document drafting and code querying.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Younger (18-26) and middle-aged (27-42) AEC professionals report higher LLM familiarity and usage than older professionals (43-77).
  • Perceived usefulness of LLMs is similar across all age groups among users.
  • Expectations for LLM capabilities differ by age, with younger professionals favoring inspection and field support, while all groups prioritize document drafting, summarization, and code querying.
  • Trust in LLMs is generally neutral, with older respondents expressing lower trust and transparency concerns.
  • Most AEC professionals anticipate LLMs becoming important in practice within several years.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

As large language models (LLMs) gain traction across industries, the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is increasingly exploring their potential for documentation, analytics, and decision support. Successful adoption depends on how practitioners perceive and engage with these tools. This study provides an age-stratified empirical baseline of LLM usage, expectations, trust, and future outlook, based on a cross-sectional survey of 91 AEC professionals in three age groups (18–26, 27–42, 43–77). Younger and middle-aged respondents report significantly higher familiarity and more frequent use than older respondents, yet perceived usefulness among users is similar across groups. Expectations differ significantly for 11 of 12 assistant capabilities after false discovery rate correction, with younger professionals endorsing inspection and field-level support while all groups prioritize document drafting, summarization, and code querying. Trust is near the scale midpoint (slightly below neutral) across groups, with shared caution toward safety-critical applications consistent with calibrated reliance and lower perceived transparency among older respondents. Most respondents expect LLMs to become important in AEC practice within several years. The findings indicate that observed differences may reflect uneven exposure and skill development rather than dispositional resistance, and support a survey-informed practice framework that scales oversight from professional review to deterministic-system integration for safety-critical use.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Construction Management and Economics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyHealth Professions