Organization Science· 2004Q1
Toxic Decision Processes: A Study of Emotion and Organizational Decision Making
- 276citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2004year
Short summary
Organizational decision processes can become 'toxic,' generating widespread negative emotion through a recursive interplay of actions and emotions, unfolding in three phases: inertia, detonation, and containment.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Introduces 'toxic decision processes' where negative emotions recursively interplay with actions.
- Models toxic decision processes unfolding in three phases: inertia, detonation, and containment.
- Identifies triggers for toxic processes: sensitive, ambiguous, non-urgent issues.
- Mechanisms sustaining toxicity include 'danger zones,' emotional contagion, and suppressed emotion.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This paper addresses the role of emotion in organizational decision making. Grounding our research in the decision process literature, we introduce the concept of “toxic decision processes”: organizational decision processes that generate widespread negative emotion in an organization through the recursive interplay of members' actions and negative emotions. We draw on a longitudinal, qualitative analysis of six toxic decision processes to develop a model that describes the three phases—inertia, detonation, and containment—through which these processes unfold. Each phase is characterized by distinctive sets of interactions among decision makers and other organizational members, and by emotions such as anxiety, fear, shame, anger, and embarrassment, that shape and are shaped by these interactions. We show that toxic decision processes are triggered by issues that are sensitive, ambiguous, and nonurgent and identify several mechanisms that connect actors' emotions and actions, over time creating a toxic decision process that leads to the cumulative buildup and diffusion of toxicity. These mechanisms include the construction of a “danger zone” around the issue that is avoided by all parties, the spread of negative emotion through processes of empathetic transmission and emotional contagion, and the suppression of widespread negative emotion that leads to the development of a volatile emotional context for future decision making. This study has important implications for the decision process literature, revealing how the different lenses through which decision making is usually viewed are connected by the emotionality that runs through each of them.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Organization Science, 2004 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Social Psychology
Social PsychologyPsychology