PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Biomedicines· 2026Q1

Dynamic CD4+ T Cell Genetics Identifies Candidate Therapeutic Targets for Allergic Rhinitis: Mendelian Randomization with Exploratory Single-Cell Contextualization

Wei Gu, Jinglei Li, Chuan Liu, Chuan Chen et al.

Short summary

A Mendelian randomization analysis of dynamic CD4+ T cell gene expression identified 9 candidate genes influencing allergic rhinitis susceptibility, with SLC25A46 and TLR1 prioritized for therapeutic targeting.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 9 candidate genes were identified as influencing allergic rhinitis susceptibility through Mendelian randomization.
  • 418 gene-profile pairs showed colocalization support, and 70 genes passed SMR and HEIDI tests.
  • SLC25A46 and TLR1 were prioritized as potential therapeutic targets based on computational screening.
  • TLR1's TIR docking site showed favorable binding characteristics (binding energy -5.86 kcal/mol, MD RMSD 0.20 nm).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background: Allergic rhinitis is common and clinically heterogeneous, but the genes whose genetically regulated immune-state expression influences susceptibility remain incompletely resolved. Methods: We integrated dynamic CD4+ T cell eQTL data (46 activation-state profiles) with allergic rhinitis GWAS summary statistics, applying transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization (MR), colocalization, SMR/HEIDI, metabolite screening, paired single-cell RNA-seq and TCR analysis, and computational follow-up. Colocalization support was prespecified as conditional ratio PP.H4/(PP.H3 + PP.H4) > 0.7; HEIDI at p > 0.05. Results: After MHC-region exclusion, 50,654 gene-profile pairs were tested and 129 MR-significant genes were identified. Colocalization supported 418 pairs (111 genes); 70 genes passed both SMR and HEIDI; and cross-database comparison yielded a nine-gene overlap set. In GSE200107, baseline good-versus-poor responder differences were larger than treatment-induced transcriptional change; patient-level reanalysis found no pair surviving multiple-testing correction (n = 4 vs. 3); these findings are hypothesis-generating. Paired TCR analysis suggested greater clonotype renewal in good responders (descriptive). Structure-guided screening prioritized unvalidated binder candidates for SLC25A46 and TLR1 (TLR1 TIR docking −5.86 kcal/mol; MD RMSD 0.20 nm). Conclusions: An exploratory metabolite screen yielded nominally significant indirect-effect signals, but the candidate metabolite did not colocalize with the disease locus. This framework prioritizes candidate therapeutic targets for allergic rhinitis.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Biomedicines, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Immunology and Allergy

Immunology and AllergyMedicine