PofoliaShared via Pofolia

World Scientific Studies in International Economics· 2014· Book chapter

National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade

Wilfred J. Ethier

Short summary

The dominant Hecksch-Ohlin-Samuelson (H-O-S) trade model, despite its long-standing influence, faces persistent suspicion due to inconsistencies with modern commerce facts.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The Hecksch-Ohlin-Samuelson (H-O-S) model has dominated international trade theory for over a quarter century.
  • There is a widespread suspicion that the H-O-S model's structure is inconsistent with modern trade facts.
  • The paper aims to identify the specific areas of this inconsistency.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

For over a quarter century, the Heck-scher-Ohlin-Samuelson (H-O-S) trade model has thoroughly dominated work in the pure theory of international trade. Indeed this model is often identified as “the” modern theory of trade. But this dominance has always been rendered uneasy by a widespread suspicion that the salient facts of modern commerce are inconsistent with the theoretical structure. Two broad areas of suspicion may be identified…

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. World Scientific Studies in International Economics, 2014 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

General Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEconomics, Econometrics and Finance