Results in Engineering· 2023Q1· Review
Hydrogen production by water electrolysis technologies: A review
- 640citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2023year
Short summary
This review compares four water electrolysis technologies (PEM, AWE, AEM, SOEC) for hydrogen production, highlighting their pros and cons, and evaluating their potential for using impure water sources.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis offers high-purity hydrogen with efficient production.
- Alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) is a commercially proven technology for hydrogen generation.
- Anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolysis uses low-cost electrocatalysts, reducing production costs.
- Solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC) provides high conversion efficiency but requires long startup times due to high operating temperatures.
- The review investigates the technical barriers and potential of these technologies for using impure water sources.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Hydrogen as an energy source has been identified as an optimal pathway for mitigating climate change by combining renewable electricity with water electrolysis systems. Proton exchange membrane (PEM) technology has received a substantial amount of attention because of its ability to efficiently produce high-purity hydrogen while minimising challenges associated with handling and maintenance. Another hydrogen generation technology, alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), has been widely used in commercial hydrogen production applications. Anion exchange membrane (AEM) technology can produce hydrogen at relatively low costs because the noble metal catalysts used in PEM and AWE systems are replaced with conventional low-cost electrocatalysts. Solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC) technology is another electrolysis technology for producing hydrogen at relatively high conversion efficiencies, low cost, and with low associated emissions. However, the operating temperatures of SOECs are high which necessitates long startup times. This review addresses the current state of technologies capable of using impure water in water electrolysis systems. Commercially available water electrolysis systems were extensively discussed and compared. The technical barriers of hydrogen production by PEM and AEM were also investigated. Furthermore, commercial PEM stack electrolyzer performance was evaluated using artificial river water (soft water). An integrated system approach was recommended for meeting the power and pure water demands using reversible seawater by combining renewable electricity, water electrolysis, and fuel cells. AEM performance was considered to be low, requiring further developments to enhance the membrane's lifetime.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Results in Engineering, 2023 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Energy Engineering and Power TechnologyEnergy