PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Scientific Reports· 2026Q1

Estimation of NATM excavation-support classes at tunnel excavation faces using a deep learning algorithm

H. Selin Özdemir, Gokcen Gokceoglu, Nazlı Tunar Özcan, Candan Gökçeoğlu

Short summary

A deep learning model (MobileNetV2) accurately classifies NATM tunnel excavation-support classes from photographs, achieving a macro-F1 of 0.893 on a test set.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A deep learning model (MobileNetV2) was developed to classify NATM excavation-support classes from tunnel face images.
  • The model achieved a macro-F1 score of 0.893 and an accuracy of 0.905 on cross-validation, and 0.783 macro-F1 on an independent test set.
  • Lightweight MobileNet architectures were used, outperforming larger models in efficiency.
  • Grad-CAM analysis confirmed predictions were based on relevant geological features, not background noise.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Accurate determination of the geotechnical conditions at the tunnel face is essential for ensuring safe and effective excavation and support operations during tunnel construction with New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM). Therefore, engineering geologists carefully and systematically collect geotechnical data from the excavation face to ensure reliable NATM excavation-support classes. The development of artificial intelligence algorithms has provided significant advantages for such applications. In this study, a deep learning model is proposed to identify NATM excavation-support classes from tunnel face photographs obtained during the construction of a tunnel using the NATM. The BT-05 tunnel located in Osmaniye province (Türkiye) was selected as the data source for the study. After screening for near-duplicate photographs, the dataset comprised 245 photographs of 209 distinct excavation faces. Because the distinction between the C3-1 and C3-1 A support classes is established from instrumentation rather than from the appearance of the face, these were combined, and three excavation-support classes (B2, C2, and C3-1) were classified. Lightweight MobileNet architectures were fine-tuned with a custom classifier head, with class imbalance addressed through a Focal Loss objective and weighted oversampling. Evaluation used a nested, face-grouped cross-validation in which all photographs of one excavation face were confined to a single fold and every model-selection decision, including Bayesian hyperparameter optimisation, was performed on validation data drawn from within the training partition; the procedure was repeated over three random seeds with bootstrap confidence intervals. Under this protocol, MobileNetV2 achieved a macro-F1 of 0.893 ± 0.019 (accuracy 0.905 ± 0.010) and MobileNetV3-Small 0.847 ± 0.051 (accuracy 0.878 ± 0.020), matching substantially larger architectures at a fraction of their parameter count and CPU latency. On an independent tunnel section withheld entirely from training and model selection, MobileNetV2 retained an accuracy of 0.844 and a macro-F1 of 0.783, while performance under partitioning by contiguous excavation block was lower, delimiting the conditions under which the model can be applied. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) analysis further confirmed that predictions are driven by geologically meaningful regions of the tunnel face rather than background artefacts. The results conclude that the proposed deep learning-based approach provides an objective, fast, and cost-effective decision-support tool for on-site geotechnical assessment in NATM tunnel construction, contributing significantly to the digital transformation of tunnel engineering.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Civil and Structural Engineering

Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering