Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology· 2026Q1
Investigating tunnel seepage erosion and induced structural mechanical response using CFD-DEM-FEM method
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A novel CFD-DEM-FEM model simulates seepage erosion in tunnels, identifying three erosion modes based on crack width and showing that shifting cracks from crown to invert increases lining tensile stress and damage potential.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A CFD-DEM-FEM framework is developed to simulate tunnel seepage erosion and structural response.
- Three distinct erosion modes are identified based on crack width.
- Crack position significantly influences the erosion zone's spatial extent.
- Increased burial depth and groundwater level intensify soil loss.
- Shifting cracks from crown to invert reduces soil's load-bearing capacity, increasing lining tensile stress and damage risk.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Seepage erosion, induced by groundwater infiltrating surrounding soils through cracks between tunnel segments, poses a significant threat to the long-term stability of underground tunnels. However, the evolution of erosion and its influence on tunnel mechanical behavior remain insufficiently understood. This study presents a macro–micro numerical investigation of tunnel erosion using a coupled CFD‑DEM-FEM (computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method- finite element method) framework. The CFD‑DEM model is used to capture soil particle migration, seepage flow, and microscopic force-chain evolution, while the resulting particle-structure interaction forces are transferred to an FEM model to evaluate the mechanical response of the tunnel lining. Parametric analyses are conducted to examine the effects of crack width, crack position, tunnel burial depth, and groundwater level on soil mass loss, surface displacement, particle migration trajectories, and micro-scale force chains. The results show that three distinct erosion modes can be identified according to crack width. Variations in crack position significantly modify the spatial extent of the erosion zone, while increased burial depth and groundwater level intensify soil loss. Structural analysis further indicates that when the crack location shifts from the tunnel crown toward the invert, the ability of the surrounding soil to transfer overburden pressure gradually decreases, leading to higher tensile stresses and a greater potential for structural damage. Overall, the study provides a qualitative understanding of the coupled evolution of seepage erosion and tunnel mechanical response, offering insights into the mechanisms of tunnel deterioration in sandy soils and potential strategies for mitigating erosion‑induced tunnel failures.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Civil and Structural Engineering
Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering