PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Applied Energy· 2026Q1

Two-layer scheduling and model predictive control of a multiphysics alkaline water electrolyzer with integrated energy storage under variable renewables

Ruilin Yin, Qingsong Hua, Jian Wang, Li Sun

Short summary

A two-layer scheduling and control strategy for alkaline water electrolyzers (AWE) with integrated energy storage reduced PV curtailment by 11.79% and saved 160 kWh/day, while model predictive control (MPC) limited peak overtemperature to 1.72 °C and achieved a 0.65-kW mean power deviation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A two-layer strategy coordinates AWE with Li-ion batteries and hydrogen storage to buffer RES variability.
  • The energy storage system reduced PV curtailment by 11.79% and saved 160 kWh of electricity per day.
  • Model predictive control (MPC) limited peak overtemperature to 1.72 °C, outperforming PID.
  • MPC achieved a mean power deviation of 0.65 kW, compared to PID.
  • AWE power response lags scheduling commands by 43.15 min, and hydrogen production lags power by 12.02 min.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) is a promising technology for large-scale renewable energy storage. However, with the increasing penetration of renewable energy sources (RESs), maintaining economic and safe operation under fluctuating power inputs remains challenging due to the large inertia of AWE systems. To this end, a two-layer scheduling and control strategy is proposed based on a hydrogen production system model that integrates multiple physical domains, including electrochemical processes, fluid dynamics, and heat transfer. At the scheduling level, Li-ion battery and hydrogen storage units are coordinated with the electrolyzer to buffer RES variability, thereby smoothing power fluctuations imposed on the AWE stack and reducing dependence on grid electricity purchases. The energy storage system reduced the PV curtailment by an average of 11.79% and saved 160 kWh of electricity per day. At the control level, controllers are designed for electrolyzer power tracking and lye temperature regulation, subject to hydrogen impurity constraints. Comparative dynamic simulations show that model predictive control (MPC) outperforms tuned PID-based strategies: MPC limits peak overtemperature to 1.72 °C, and achieves a 0.65-kW mean power deviation. The results of the inertial analysis show the power response lagging behind the scheduling command by 43.15 min, and hydrogen production response further lagging behind the power change by around 12.02 min.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Applied Energy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Energy Engineering and Power TechnologyEnergy