PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Italian Journal of Animal Science· 2026Q1

The effect of partial replacement of soybean oil with insect fats on dietary short-term preference in laying hens

María Palomar, M.D. Soler, José Antonio García-Bautista, Araceli Orozco et al.

Short summary

Laying hens showed no significant short-term feed preference difference between diets containing soybean oil and those partially replacing it with 2% Hermetia illucens (HI) or Tenebrio molitor (TM) larvae fats.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Laying hens did not exhibit a significant short-term preference between diets with soybean oil and diets partially replacing it with 2% Hermetia illucens (HI) fat.
  • Laying hens did not exhibit a significant short-term preference between diets with soybean oil and diets partially replacing it with 2% Tenebrio molitor (TM) fat.
  • The study used double-choice tests with 48 laying hens, comparing control diets with those containing 2% insect fat inclusion.
  • Feed intake analysis via linear mixed models found no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in preference.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Assessment of the acceptance of novel feed ingredients provides valuable insights into their potential integration into practical animal feed formulations. However, despite growing interest in insect-derived feed ingredients, information on the short-term palatability of insect fats in laying hens remains scarce. This study evaluated the effect of partially replacing soybean oil (SO) with fats derived from Hermetia illucens larvae (HI) and Tenebrio molitor larvae (TM) on short-term feed preference of laying hens. Forty-eight 34-week-old hens were individually housed in enriched cages. After a seven-day training period, birds underwent double-choice tests with three mash diets containing 5.7% added fat: control (C) with 5.7% SO; HI with 3.7% SO and 2% HI fat; and TM with 3.7% SO and 2% TM fat. Two equally sized feeders were placed side by side in front of each cage. Each hen completed three tests (C vs. C, C vs. HI, and C vs. TM) over three days, in a balanced randomised order. Following a 2–h fasting period, each test comprised two 120–min feeding sessions separated by a 2–h fasting interval. Feeder positions were reversed between sessions to minimise positional bias. Feed intake was analysed using a linear mixed model fitted by restricted maximum likelihood. None of the direct within-comparison contrasts reached statistical significance (p > 0.05). At 2% inclusion neither HI nor TM fat produced detectable differences in short-term feed preference. These novel findings indicate that both insect fats can be incorporated without impairing feed palatability, supporting their potential use as alternative lipid sources.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Insect Science

Insect ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences