International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology· 2026Q2
A Comparative Evaluation and a Benefit Assessment of Sintering α‐Al 2 O 3 in Induction and Conventional Furnaces
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Induction heating achieves higher density (98.2%) and hardness (2060 HV) in α‐Al 2 O 3 ceramics compared to conventional furnaces (97.1% density, 1980 HV) at 1500°C, while reducing energy consumption by 92.37%.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Induction sintering yielded ~98.2% relative density and 2060 ± 22 HV hardness for α‐Al 2 O 3 at 1500°C.
- Conventional sintering under identical conditions resulted in 97.1% density and 1980 ± 28 HV hardness.
- Induction heating achieves faster, more homogeneous temperature distribution compared to conventional furnaces.
- Induction sintering reduced total cumulative electrical consumption by 92.37% at 1500°C.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT This work provides a quantitative comparison of induction heating and conventional resistance‐furnace sintering for the processing of high‐purity α‐Al 2 O 3 ceramics, focusing on thermal behavior, energy efficiency, and sintering quality. The study combines experimental characterization of sintering samples and analysis of thermal curves. Here is also covered an energy‐based modeling to propose a microstructural development, heating behavior, and overall energy demand for induction and conventional resistance furnaces. The materials used in this work are commercial alumina (as‐received) and milled powder to isolate the effect of the heating method, with a mechanically milled condition. We also examined its influence on microstructure. The samples sintered by induction heating achieved a maximum relative density of ∼98.2% and a Vickers hardness of 2060 ± 22 HV at 1500°C for milled alumina powder, compared to 1980 ± 28 HV and 97.1% relative density for conventional sintering under identical conditions. Thermal simulations in a Matlab‐based finite differences methods (FDM) model reveal that resistance‐furnace heating is dominated by slow radiative and convective fluxes, leading to a slower achievement of a homogeneous temperature distribution, which in practice means the system takes longer to equilibrate. In induction heating, the sintering starts in the first few minutes and the pellet edges exhibit a more pronounced temperature rise. However, this condition diminishes rapidly, and within a short time the temperature distribution becomes homogeneous, achieving uniformity significantly faster than in a conventional furnace. Energy analysis shows that induction reduces total cumulative electrical consumption by 92.37% relative to the furnace at the highest target temperature evaluated (1500°C).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Ceramics and Composites
Ceramics and CompositesMaterials Science