The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal· 2026Q1· Review
Supportive Therapies for Reducing Hypertrophic Cleft Lip Scars: A Systematic Review
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTA) and energy-based therapies (fractional CO2 and pulsed dye lasers) significantly improve scar quality, reduce width, and enhance appearance following cleft lip repair, according to a systematic review of 11 studies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTA) consistently improved scar appearance and reduced scar width.
- Fractional CO2 and pulsed dye lasers significantly improved scar texture, vascularity, and appearance.
- Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was associated with reduced scar widening.
- Silicone gel showed efficacy comparable to silicone sheets for hypertrophic scar control.
- No major treatment-related complications were reported across the evaluated therapies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of supportive therapies in improving scar quality following primary and secondary cleft lip repair. Design Systematic review conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Setting Academic and tertiary care centers. Patients Patients undergoing primary or secondary cheiloplasty who received supportive therapies for scar management. Outcome Measures Scar quality assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scar width measurements, photographic evaluation, and patient-reported outcomes. Results Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Evaluated interventions included Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTA), laser and light-based therapies, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and silicone gel. BTA consistently improved scar appearance and reduced scar width following cheiloplasty. Energy-based therapies, particularly fractional CO 2 laser and pulsed dye laser (PDL), demonstrated significant improvements in scar texture, vascularity, and overall appearance. PRP was associated with reduced scar widening, while silicone gel showed efficacy comparable to silicone sheets in controlling hypertrophic scar formation. No major treatment-related complications were reported. Conclusion Supportive therapies may improve scar quality after cheiloplasty, with the strongest evidence supporting BTA and energy-based treatments. Further high-quality prospective studies are required to establish standardized treatment protocols.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Dermatology
DermatologyMedicine