New England Journal of Medicine· 2017Q1
Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery
- 768citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2017year
Short summary
A restrictive red-cell transfusion strategy (hemoglobin <7.5 g/dL) was noninferior to a liberal strategy (hemoglobin <9.5 g/dL or <8.5 g/dL) for a composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or renal failure in 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Restrictive transfusion (Hb <7.5 g/dL) was noninferior to liberal transfusion (Hb <9.5 g/dL or <8.5 g/dL) in 5243 cardiac surgery patients.
- The primary composite outcome occurred in 11.4% of the restrictive group vs. 12.5% of the liberal group (P<0.001 for noninferiority).
- Red-cell transfusion rates were significantly lower in the restrictive group (52.3%) compared to the liberal group (72.6%).
- No significant differences were observed in mortality or other secondary clinical outcomes between the groups.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of a restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion strategy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery who had a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) I of 6 or more (on a scale from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of death after cardiac surgery) to a restrictive red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <7.5 g per deciliter, starting from induction of anesthesia) or a liberal red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <9.5 g per deciliter in the operating room or intensive care unit [ICU] or was <8.5 g per deciliter in the non-ICU ward). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or by day 28, whichever came first. Secondary outcomes included red-cell transfusion and other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 11.4% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 12.5% of those in the liberal-threshold group (absolute risk difference, -1.11 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.93 to 0.72; odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Mortality was 3.0% in the restrictive-threshold group and 3.6% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.16). Red-cell transfusion occurred in 52.3% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 72.6% of those in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.47). There were no significant between-group differences with regard to the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive strategy regarding red-cell transfusion was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis, with less blood transfused. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; TRICS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02042898 .).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Biochemistry (Medicine)
BiochemistryMedicine