New England Journal of Medicine· 2016Q1
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients
- 5,046citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) was non-inferior to surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients, with similar rates of death or disabling stroke at 2 years (19.3% vs. 21.1%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- TAVR was non-inferior to surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients for death or disabling stroke at 2 years.
- The Kaplan-Meier event rates at 2 years were 19.3% for TAVR and 21.1% for surgery (P=0.25).
- TAVR showed a significant benefit in the transfemoral-access cohort (death/disabling stroke HR 0.79, P=0.05).
- TAVR resulted in larger valve areas and fewer complications including acute kidney injury, bleeding, and atrial fibrillation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous trials have shown that among high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, survival rates are similar with transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic-valve replacement. We evaluated the two procedures in a randomized trial involving intermediate-risk patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2032 intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, at 57 centers, to undergo either TAVR or surgical replacement. The primary end point was death from any cause or disabling stroke at 2 years. The primary hypothesis was that TAVR would not be inferior to surgical replacement. Before randomization, patients were entered into one of two cohorts on the basis of clinical and imaging findings; 76.3% of the patients were included in the transfemoral-access cohort and 23.7% in the transthoracic-access cohort. RESULTS: The rate of death from any cause or disabling stroke was similar in the TAVR group and the surgery group (P=0.001 for noninferiority). At 2 years, the Kaplan-Meier event rates were 19.3% in the TAVR group and 21.1% in the surgery group (hazard ratio in the TAVR group, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.09; P=0.25). In the transfemoral-access cohort, TAVR resulted in a lower rate of death or disabling stroke than surgery (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.00; P=0.05), whereas in the transthoracic-access cohort, outcomes were similar in the two groups. TAVR resulted in larger aortic-valve areas than did surgery and also resulted in lower rates of acute kidney injury, severe bleeding, and new-onset atrial fibrillation; surgery resulted in fewer major vascular complications and less paravalvular aortic regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: In intermediate-risk patients, TAVR was similar to surgical aortic-valve replacement with respect to the primary end point of death or disabling stroke. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; PARTNER 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01314313.).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineMedicine