PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2018Q1· Clinical trial

Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults

Matthew W. Semler, Wesley H. Self, Jonathan P. Wanderer, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld et al.

Short summary

In critically ill adults, administering balanced crystalloids instead of saline for intravenous fluids led to a 1.1 percentage point reduction in major adverse kidney events within 30 days, a composite outcome including death, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Balanced crystalloids reduced major adverse kidney events by 1.1% (14.3% vs 15.4%) in critically ill adults over 30 days.
  • Major adverse kidney events included death, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction.
  • The trial was a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover study involving 15,802 adults across five ICUs.
  • In-hospital mortality was slightly lower with balanced crystalloids (10.3% vs 11.1%), though not statistically significant (P=0.06).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both balanced crystalloids and saline are used for intravenous fluid administration in critically ill adults, but it is not known which results in better clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial conducted in five intensive care units at an academic center, we assigned 15,802 adults to receive saline (0.9% sodium chloride) or balanced crystalloids (lactated Ringer's solution or Plasma-Lyte A) according to the randomization of the unit to which they were admitted. The primary outcome was a major adverse kidney event within 30 days - a composite of death from any cause, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction (defined as an elevation of the creatinine level to ≥200% of baseline) - all censored at hospital discharge or 30 days, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: Among the 7942 patients in the balanced-crystalloids group, 1139 (14.3%) had a major adverse kidney event, as compared with 1211 of 7860 patients (15.4%) in the saline group (marginal odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 0.99; conditional odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.99; P=0.04). In-hospital mortality at 30 days was 10.3% in the balanced-crystalloids group and 11.1% in the saline group (P=0.06). The incidence of new renal-replacement therapy was 2.5% and 2.9%, respectively (P=0.08), and the incidence of persistent renal dysfunction was 6.4% and 6.6%, respectively (P=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults, the use of balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid administration resulted in a lower rate of the composite outcome of death from any cause, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction than the use of saline. (Funded by the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and others; SMART-MED and SMART-SURG ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02444988 and NCT02547779 .).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineMedicine