European Respiratory Journal· 2017Q1· Review
International ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia
- 1,408citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2017year
Short summary
New international guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) have been developed, updating recommendations based on a decade of new research and clinical trials.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- First international guidelines for HAP/VAP in a decade.
- Developed by a panel of 15 experts using the GRADE methodology.
- Addresses diagnosis, treatment, and prevention based on new research.
- Highlights differences in European and US approaches.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The most recent European guidelines and task force reports on hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were published almost 10 years ago. Since then, further randomised clinical trials of HAP and VAP have been conducted and new information has become available. Studies of epidemiology, diagnosis, empiric treatment, response to treatment, new antibiotics or new forms of antibiotic administration and disease prevention have changed old paradigms. In addition, important differences between approaches in Europe and the USA have become apparent.The European Respiratory Society launched a project to develop new international guidelines for HAP and VAP. Other European societies, including the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, were invited to participate and appointed their representatives. The Latin American Thoracic Association was also invited.A total of 15 experts and two methodologists made up the panel. Three experts from the USA were also invited (Michael S. Niederman, Marin Kollef and Richard Wunderink).Applying the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, the panel selected seven PICO (population-intervention-comparison-outcome) questions that generated a series of recommendations for HAP/VAP diagnosis, treatment and prevention.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. European Respiratory Journal, 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineMedicine