Circulation· 2016Q1
Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
- 2,417citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a stronger predictor of mortality than smoking, hypertension, or diabetes, and significantly improves risk prediction when added to traditional factors.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, and cancer mortality.
- CRF may be a stronger predictor of mortality than smoking, hypertension, high cholesterol, and type 2 diabetes.
- Adding CRF to traditional risk factors significantly improves the reclassification of risk for adverse outcomes.
- Assessing CRF presents opportunities to enhance patient management and encourage lifestyle-based risk reduction strategies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Mounting evidence has firmly established that low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) are associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, and mortality rates attributable to various cancers. A growing body of epidemiological and clinical evidence demonstrates not only that CRF is a potentially stronger predictor of mortality than established risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, high cholesterol, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, but that the addition of CRF to traditional risk factors significantly improves the reclassification of risk for adverse outcomes. The purpose of this statement is to review current knowledge related to the association between CRF and health outcomes, increase awareness of the added value of CRF to improve risk prediction, and suggest future directions in research. Although the statement is not intended to be a comprehensive review, critical references that address important advances in the field are highlighted. The underlying premise of this statement is that the addition of CRF for risk classification presents health professionals with unique opportunities to improve patient management and to encourage lifestyle-based strategies designed to reduce cardiovascular risk. These opportunities must be realized to optimize the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease and hence meet the American Heart Association's 2020 goals.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Circulation, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Complementary and alternative medicine
Complementary and alternative medicineMedicine