BMC Urology· 2026Q2· Case report
Asymmetrical bilateral ureteral duplication: a cadaveric case report illustrating the clinical implications of a rare congenital urinary tract anomaly
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A cadaveric study identified asymmetrical bilateral ureteral duplication, with complete duplication on the right and incomplete on the left, highlighting the rarity and clinical importance of this anomaly.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Asymmetrical bilateral ureteral duplication, with complete duplication on one side and incomplete on the other, is a rare congenital anomaly.
- The case involved a complete right-sided duplication and an incomplete left-sided duplication found incidentally in a cadaver.
- No gross hydronephrosis or ureteral dilation was observed in the specimen.
- Recognition of this variant is crucial for accurate radiologic interpretation, endoscopic procedures, and surgical planning.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Background Ureteral duplication is among the most common congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract; however, asymmetrical bilateral ureteral duplication, characterized by complete duplication on one side and incomplete duplication on the contralateral side, has rarely been reported. Recognition of this anatomical variant is important because duplicated ureters may complicate diagnostic evaluation and operative planning. Case presentation We report an incidental cadaveric finding in an 84-year-old female with complete right-sided ureteral duplication and incomplete left-sided duplication. The two right ureters descended in parallel without crossing, remained separate throughout their course, and terminated at two separate ureteral orifices within the bladder. On the left, two ureters coursed separately before converging approximately 9 cm distal to the left renal hilum and entering the bladder through a single ureteral orifice. No gross external evidence of hydronephrosis or ureteral dilation was observed. The relationships of the duplicated ureters to the renal moieties and specific calyces were not documented during dissection. Conclusions This case adds to the limited body of literature describing asymmetrical bilateral ureteral duplication and reinforces the importance of recognizing rare congenital ureteral variants during radiologic interpretation, endoscopic procedures, and surgical intervention.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Urology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthMedicine