PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Animal Cognition· 2026Q2

Chimpanzee food calls provide information about the value and type of food: a playback study

Stuart K. Watson, Tanja Kaller, Leveda Cheng, Jen Wathan et al.

Short summary

Chimpanzee food calls are more specific than previously thought, conveying information about individual food types (e.g., specific fruits) beyond just their general value (high vs. low preference).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Chimpanzee food calls are acoustically different for various food types within high and low preference categories.
  • Playback experiments confirmed that chimpanzee subjects could discriminate between calls for different specific food types.
  • This finding demonstrates a higher degree of specificity in chimpanzee food calls than previously understood.
  • The specificity observed in food calls is comparable to that found in alarm call systems.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Functionally referential signals are taxonomically widespread but vary greatly in the specificity of information they convey to receivers. Chimpanzee food calls indicate the relative preference value of the eliciting food in a way that is intelligible to receivers, but whether their specificity extends further than this, to individual food types within preference categories, has not been empirically tested. Here, we sought to extend these previous findings using acoustic analyses and playback experiments to determine (a) whether food calls elicited by foods with similar preference values (i.e. multiple high value foods) are acoustically discriminable from one another, and (b) whether this information is intelligible to receivers. Our acoustic analysis indicated acoustic differences between calls associated with both high and low preference foods, and the foods within each of those categories. Crucially, our playback experiment demonstrated this highly specific information regarding the referent was also accessible to the receiver. Specifically, our subject was able to discriminate between calls elicited by (i) high and low value foods, (ii) individual types of high value food, and (iii) individual types of low value food. This represents an unprecedented degree of specificity in referential food calls of our closest living relatives, which has previously not been identified outside of alarm call systems.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Animal Cognition, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Social Psychology

Social PsychologyPsychology