PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Project Management Journal· 2026Q1

When and How Cognitive Biases Enhance Project Investment Decisions

Ofer Zwikael, Alicia Gilchrist, Amelia O’Meagher, Aulia Haley

Short summary

Recency bias, previously seen as a hindrance, can enhance project investment decision quality by prioritizing the latest, contextually relevant information in dynamic environments.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Recency bias can positively impact project investment decision quality.
  • The benefit of recency bias is most pronounced in dynamic project environments.
  • Reliance on the latest, contextually relevant information is key to this enhancement.
  • Cognitive biases can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on project decision-making.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Project investment decisions (i.e., selecting which project proposals to fund) are critical for project and organizational success, because poor decisions can lead to wasted resources, missed opportunities, diminished competitiveness, and ultimately project failure. Literature identifies cognitive bias (e.g., optimism, escalation, anchoring, and overconfidence bias) as a key factor that hinders project investment decision-making. However, we argue that cognitive bias can also have positive effects on the quality of these decisions. We interviewed 15 project practitioners and surveyed 101 managers to uncover when cognitive biases enhance project investment decisions and how. We found recency bias is a key cognitive bias that enhances project investment decision quality, because in contemporary dynamic project environments reliance on the latest, contextually relevant information becomes particularly valuable. We contribute to the project management literature by explaining how cognitive biases can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on project decision-making.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Project Management Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Management Science and Operations Research

Management Science and Operations ResearchDecision Sciences