PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Ageing International· 2026Q2

Older Adults’ Perceived Barriers to Non-Joining Community-Based Cognitive Stimulation Programs: A Qualitative Study

Agnieszka Konieczna, Monika Żak

Short summary

Older adults perceive barriers related to program design, social concerns, and resistance to change as reasons for not joining community-based cognitive stimulation programs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Five themes of perceived barriers to joining cognitive stimulation programs were identified: perceptions of cognitive decline, awareness/effectiveness, program design/challenges, social concerns, and resistance to change.
  • Clear information on program content and benefits, less evaluative formats, and greater flexibility/accessibility can support participation.
  • Attention to social comfort is crucial for encouraging older adults to join these programs.
  • The study involved semi-structured interviews with 17 community-dwelling older adults.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Despite the growing availability of community-based cognitive interventions, relatively few older adults participate in such programs, and reasons for non-participation remain insufficiently understood. This qualitative study explored older adults’ perceived barriers to joining structured community-based cognitive stimulation programs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 community-dwelling older adults representing three participation profiles. Data were analyzed inductively using thematic analysis guided by Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework. Five themes were identified: (a) perceptions of cognitive decline and the need for intervention, (b) awareness and perceived effectiveness of cognitive interventions, (c) perceptions of program design and participation challenges, (d) social concerns, and (e) resistance to change and new challenges. The findings suggest that participation may be supported by clear information about program content and potential benefits, less school-like and evaluative formats, greater flexibility and accessibility, and attention to social comfort. Because the participant group was small, predominantly female, and locally recruited, the findings should be interpreted as context-specific. They may inform the design and communication of community-based cognitive stimulation programs.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Ageing International, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Psychiatry and Mental health

Psychiatry and Mental healthMedicine