PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Personality· 2026Q1

Who Achieves Long‐Term Goals? Development and Validation of the DPR Conceptualization of Trait Self‐Control and the DPR Self‐Control Scale

Lasse Wennerhold, Dorota Reis, Malte Friese

Short summary

A new DPR conceptualization and scale (DPRS) integrate trait self-control dimensions: Direction (individual goals), Proactive Regulation (planning), and Reactive Regulation (impulse control). The DPRS demonstrated good validity, predicting outcomes better than existing scales.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Introduces the DPR conceptualization of trait self-control with three dimensions: Direction, Proactive Regulation, and Reactive Regulation.
  • Developed and validated the DPR Self-Control Scale (DPRS) through eight studies with a total of 1918 participants.
  • The DPRS demonstrates good substantive, structural, nomological, and predictive validity.
  • The DPRS shows incremental predictive validity compared to existing trait self-control scales.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Trait self‐control predicts many desirable life outcomes ranging from health to wealth. Yet, conceptual issues around the construct (e.g., how to integrate coexisting perspectives or acknowledge the variability of individual goals and dominant tendencies) seem insufficiently resolved. Here, we develop thoughts toward an integrative, multidimensional theoretical conceptualization of trait self‐control comprising three dimensions: Direction ( D ) refers to the cognitive representation of a configuration of individual long‐term goals, Proactive Regulation ( P ) to typical performance in planning with foresight, and Reactive Regulation ( R ) to typical performance in controlling present dominant thoughts, feelings, and behavioral tendencies. Method To operationalize and validate this conceptualization as a self‐report scale, we developed the DPR Self‐Control Scale (DPRS) across two qualitative studies ( N total = 100) focusing on substantive validity and four quantitative studies focusing on structural validity and external validation ( N total = 1918). Results The results indicate good substantive, structural, nomological, and predictive validity of the DPRS, including incremental validity with regard to established trait self‐control scales. Conclusions With the DPR conceptualization of trait self‐control and the DPRS, we hope to provide a solid conceptual and diagnostic foundation for further basic and applied work on trait self‐control, from understanding its foundations to strengthening it through interventions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Personality, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Applied Psychology

Applied PsychologyPsychology