PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of the Sociology of Language· 2026Q1

Competing discourses about language, immigration, and integration in Norwegian media

Rafael Lomeu Gomes

Short summary

Norwegian media discourses about "Kebab Norwegian" reveal shifting boundaries of acceptable public debate on immigration and integration.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Analyzed 90 Norwegian articles from 2015-2021 concerning "Kebab Norwegian."
  • Identified five designations for "Kebab Norwegian": slang-marked, bad/wrong, style, multiethnolect, and disputed.
  • Applies Critical Discourse Studies, register theory, language ideologies, and decoloniality.
  • Demonstrates how media discourses on "Kebab Norwegian" reflect shifting public debate boundaries on immigration and integration.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Media discourse has been an important site of investigation in attempts to understand the semiotic dimensions of power relations, including in analyses of ways in which linguistic and social hierarchies are discursively forged and contested. In this article, I examine Norwegian media discourses on “Kebab Norwegian”, a register that has been typically associated with youth with immigrant background in Oslo, Norway. The corpus generated for this study is composed of 90 articles containing the query term kebabnorsk (“Kebab Norwegian”) published in five newspapers in Norway between 2015 and 2021. Drawing on analytical tools from Critical Discourse Studies, the analysis undertaken here has identified five designations of Kebab Norwegian: (1) as slang-marked; (2) as bad, wrong, broken; (3) as style; (4) as dialect, sociolect, multiethnolect; and (5) in dispute. The article provides an integrated perspective that combines registers and language ideologies and engages with theories of decoloniality to demonstrate that investigating competing discourses in Norwegian media about “Kebab Norwegian” can shed light on the particular ways in which the boundaries of what is acceptable to say in public debates about immigration, integration, and language have been shifting.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Linguistics and Language

Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences