Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences· 2018Q1
Deep neural network improves fracture detection by clinicians
- 623citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
A deep neural network trained on 135,409 radiographs by 18 orthopedic surgeons improved emergency clinicians' fracture detection sensitivity from 80.8% to 91.5% and specificity from 87.5% to 93.9%.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A deep neural network was trained by 18 orthopedic surgeons on 135,409 radiographs to detect fractures.
- Emergency clinicians' sensitivity for detecting wrist fractures improved from 80.8% (unaided) to 91.5% (aided) using the AI.
- Specificity for fracture detection increased from 87.5% (unaided) to 93.9% (aided) with AI assistance.
- The AI model led to a 47.0% relative reduction in misinterpretation rates for clinicians.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Suspected fractures are among the most common reasons for patients to visit emergency departments (EDs), and X-ray imaging is the primary diagnostic tool used by clinicians to assess patients for fractures. Missing a fracture in a radiograph often has severe consequences for patients, resulting in delayed treatment and poor recovery of function. Nevertheless, radiographs in emergency settings are often read out of necessity by emergency medicine clinicians who lack subspecialized expertise in orthopedics, and misdiagnosed fractures account for upward of four of every five reported diagnostic errors in certain EDs. In this work, we developed a deep neural network to detect and localize fractures in radiographs. We trained it to accurately emulate the expertise of 18 senior subspecialized orthopedic surgeons by having them annotate 135,409 radiographs. We then ran a controlled experiment with emergency medicine clinicians to evaluate their ability to detect fractures in wrist radiographs with and without the assistance of the deep learning model. The average clinician's sensitivity was 80.8% (95% CI, 76.7-84.1%) unaided and 91.5% (95% CI, 89.3-92.9%) aided, and specificity was 87.5% (95 CI, 85.3-89.5%) unaided and 93.9% (95% CI, 92.9-94.9%) aided. The average clinician experienced a relative reduction in misinterpretation rate of 47.0% (95% CI, 37.4-53.9%). The significant improvements in diagnostic accuracy that we observed in this study show that deep learning methods are a mechanism by which senior medical specialists can deliver their expertise to generalists on the front lines of medicine, thereby providing substantial improvements to patient care.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Family Practice
Family PracticeMedicine