PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders· 2026Q1· Review

Early Reading Interventions for Children with Intellectual Disabilities Using AAC: A Systematic Review of Single-Case Designs

Line Britt Ulriksen, Marthe Bilet-Mossige, Kenneth Larsen, Anders Nordahl‐Hansen

Short summary

Children with intellectual disability (ID) using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) can benefit from early reading interventions, particularly in letter-sound correspondence and phonological awareness, according to a systematic review of seven single-case studies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Seven single-case studies involving 20 children with ID who use AAC were reviewed.
  • Four studies met What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) standards without reservation.
  • Positive effects were consistently reported for letter-sound correspondence and phonological awareness.
  • Findings for decoding skills were mixed across the included studies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Children with intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorder who use augmentative and alternative communication are often excluded from evidence-based reading instruction. Early reading skills are essential, yet assumptions about speech and cognitive prerequisites have limited research on reading interventions for AAC users. Consequently, the evidence base guiding early reading instruction for this population remains underdeveloped. This systematic review examined evidence from single‑case research evaluating early reading interventions for children with ID who use AAC. Systematic searches were conducted in seven databases (including ERIC, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE) through March 2023. Studies were included if they employed single‑case experimental designs to evaluate early reading interventions for children with ID who used AAC. Methodological quality was assessed using the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC, 2022) single‑case design standards. Results were synthesised using a structured narrative synthesis. Seven studies involving 20 participants met the inclusion criteria. Four studies met WWC standards without reservation. Across studies, positive effects were consistently reported for letter–sound correspondence and phonological awareness, whereas findings for decoding were mixed. The evidence base was limited by small samples and a narrow focus on early reading components. Single‑case evidence suggests that children with ID who use AAC can benefit from early reading interventions, particularly for foundational alphabetic skills. However, the small number of studies and limited outcome scope highlight the need for more comprehensive and methodologically robust research.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Occupational TherapyHealth Professions