BMJ Quality & Safety· 2013Q1
Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change
- 407citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2013year
Short summary
Cognitive change, essential for clinical reasoning and reducing diagnostic errors, is hindered by individual biases and contextual factors, but can be facilitated by educational, workplace, and 'forcing function' strategies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Cognitive debiasing is crucial for sound clinical reasoning and mitigating diagnostic errors.
- Individual biases and contextual factors act as significant impediments to cognitive change.
- Strategies for debiasing include educational approaches, workplace interventions, and 'forcing functions'.
- Ambient and contextual influences on decision-making quality must be addressed.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
In a companion paper, we proposed that cognitive debiasing is a skill essential in developing sound clinical reasoning to mitigate the incidence of diagnostic failure. We reviewed the origins of cognitive biases and some proposed mechanisms for how debiasing processes might work. In this paper, we first outline a general schema of how cognitive change occurs and the constraints that may apply. We review a variety of individual factors, many of them biases themselves, which may be impediments to change. We then examine the major strategies that have been developed in the social sciences and in medicine to achieve cognitive and affective debiasing, including the important concept of forcing functions. The abundance and rich variety of approaches that exist in the literature and in individual clinical domains illustrate the difficulties inherent in achieving cognitive change, and also the need for such interventions. Ongoing cognitive debiasing is arguably the most important feature of the critical thinker and the well-calibrated mind. We outline three groups of suggested interventions going forward: educational strategies, workplace strategies and forcing functions. We stress the importance of ambient and contextual influences on the quality of individual decision making and the need to address factors known to impair calibration of the decision maker. We also emphasise the importance of introducing these concepts and corollary development of training in critical thinking in the undergraduate level in medical education.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMJ Quality & Safety, 2013 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Family Practice
Family PracticeMedicine