Diabetic Medicine· 2013Q1· Review
Real‐world factors affecting adherence to insulin therapy in patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
- 304citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2013year
Short summary
A systematic review of 17 studies found that adherence to insulin therapy in diabetes patients is generally poor, with few consistently identified predictive factors beyond age, female sex, and travel. Fear of injections and public embarrassment were cited barriers.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Adherence to insulin therapy in diabetes patients is generally poor.
- Few factors consistently predict non-adherence, with age, female sex, and travel appearing in multiple studies.
- Fear of injections and embarrassment in public are significant patient-perceived barriers.
- Using pen devices and reducing out-of-pocket costs appear to improve adherence.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
AIMS: To identify real-world factors affecting adherence to insulin therapy in patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE in November 2011 to identify studies reporting factors associated with adherence/non-adherence to insulin therapy in adults with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were identified; six used self-reported measures and 11 used calculated measures of adherence. Most (13/17) were conducted exclusively in the USA. Four categories of factors associated with non-adherence were identified: predictive factors for non-adherence, patient-perceived barriers to adherence, type of delivery device and cost of medication. For predictive factors and patient-perceived barriers, only age, female sex and travelling were associated with non-adherence in more than one study. Fear of injections and embarrassment of injecting in public were also cited as reasons for non-adherence. Conversely, adherence was improved by initiating therapy with, or switching to, a pen device (in four studies), and by changing to an insurance scheme that lowered the financial burden on patients (in two studies). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to insulin therapy is generally poor. Few factors or patient-perceived barriers were consistently identified as predictive for non-adherence, although findings collectively suggest that a more flexible regimen may improve adherence. Switching to a pen device and reducing patient co-payments appear to improve adherence. Further real-world studies are warranted, especially in countries other than the USA, to identify factors associated with non-adherence and enable development of strategies to improve adherence to insulin therapy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Diabetic Medicine, 2013 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Family Practice
Family PracticeMedicine