Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition· 2018Q1· Review
Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines
- 1,533citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosing and managing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in infants and children have been formulated by NASPGHAN and ESPGHAN, incorporating evidence up to June 2015.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Guidelines updated for GERD diagnosis and management in infants and children.
- Systematic literature search conducted up to June 2015.
- GRADE methodology used for assessing evidence quality.
- Recommendations finalized through expert consensus and nominal voting.
- Two algorithms developed for infants <12 months and older children.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This document serves as an update of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) 2009 clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in infants and children and is intended to be applied in daily practice and as a basis for clinical trials. Eight clinical questions addressing diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic topics were formulated. A systematic literature search was performed from October 1, 2008 (if the question was addressed by 2009 guidelines) or from inception to June 1, 2015 using Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials. The approach of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was applied to define and prioritize outcomes. For therapeutic questions, the quality of evidence was also assessed using GRADE. Grading the quality of evidence for other questions was performed according to the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS) and Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tools. During a 3-day consensus meeting, all recommendations were discussed and finalized. In cases where no randomized controlled trials (RCT; therapeutic questions) or diagnostic accuracy studies were available to support the recommendations, expert opinion was used. The group members voted on each recommendation, using the nominal voting technique. With this approach, recommendations regarding evaluation and management of infants and children with GERD to standardize and improve quality of care were formulated. Additionally, 2 algorithms were developed, 1 for infants <12 months of age and the other for older infants and children.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Gastroenterology
GastroenterologyMedicine