PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics· 2018Q1· Review

Systematic review with meta‐analysis: the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome

Alexander C. Ford, Lucinda A. Harris, Brian E. Lacy, Eamonn M.M. Quigley et al.

Short summary

A meta-analysis of 53 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found that while specific probiotic combinations/strains may benefit IBS symptoms, definitive conclusions on their efficacy are not possible. However, the antibiotic rifaximin demonstrated modest efficacy in improving symptoms for non-constipated IBS patients compared to placebo (RR of symptoms persisting = 0.84; 95% CI 0.79-0.90).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Probiotic efficacy for IBS remains largely unclear despite potential benefits from specific strains/combinations.
  • Rifaximin showed modest efficacy in improving symptoms for non-constipated IBS patients.
  • The relative risk of symptoms persisting with rifaximin was 0.84 (95% CI 0.79-0.90) compared to placebo.
  • Data for prebiotics and synbiotics in IBS were sparse.
  • Adverse events were not more frequent with probiotics or antibiotics.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic functional bowel disorder. Disturbances in the gastrointestinal microbiome may be involved in its aetiology. AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in IBS. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (up to July 2017). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults with IBS, comparing prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics or antibiotics with placebo or no therapy were eligible. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR) of remaining symptomatic after therapy, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were pooled using a standardised mean difference with a 95% CI. RESULTS: The search identified 4017 citations. Data for prebiotics and synbiotics were sparse. Fifty-three RCTs of probiotics, involving 5545 patients, were eligible. Particular combinations of probiotics, or specific species and strains, appeared to have beneficial effects on global IBS symptoms and abdominal pain, but it was not possible to draw definitive conclusions about their efficacy. There were five trials of similar design that used rifaximin in non-constipated IBS patients, which was more effective than placebo (RR of symptoms persisting = 0.84; 95% CI 0.79-0.90). Adverse events were no more common with probiotics or antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Which particular combination, species or strains of probiotics are effective for IBS remains, for the most part, unclear. Rifaximin has modest efficacy in improving symptoms in non-constipated IBS.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Gastroenterology

GastroenterologyMedicine