PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Geriatrics· 2020Q1

A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale

Sophie Church, Emily Rogers, Kenneth Rockwood, Olga Theou

Short summary

A scoping review of 183 studies found the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is widely used, particularly in hospitalized older adults, and is predictive of outcomes such as mortality (87% of cases), complications (100%), and cognition (94%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used in 183 studies identified from a literature search covering January 2005 to March 2017.
  • 63% of studies measured CFS in hospitalized patients, and 62% were published after 2015, indicating growing recent use.
  • CFS was predictive of an outcome in 74% of 526 examined associations.
  • CFS showed strong predictive power for mortality (87%), complications (100%), cognition (94%), and function (91%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frailty is increasingly recognized as an important construct which has health implications for older adults. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a judgement-based frailty tool that evaluates specific domains including comorbidity, function, and cognition to generate a frailty score ranging from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill). The aim of this scoping review is to identify and document the nature and extent of research evidence related to the CFS. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search to identify original studies that used the Clinical Frailty Scale. Medline OVID, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from January 2005 to March 2017. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Data extracted included publication date, setting, demographics, purpose of CFS assessment, and outcomes associated with CFS score. RESULTS: Our search yielded 1688 articles of which 183 studies were included. Overall, 62% of studies were conducted after 2015 and 63% of the studies measured the CFS in hospitalized patients. The association of the CFS with an outcome was examined 526 times; CFS was predictive in 74% of the cases. Mortality was the most common outcome examined with CFS being predictive 87% of the time. CFS was associated with comorbidity 73% of the time, complications 100%, length of stay 75%, falls 71%, cognition 94%, and function 91%. The CFS was associated with other frailty scores 94% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review revealed that the CFS has been widely used in multiple settings. The association of CFS score with clinical outcomes highlights its utility in the care of the aging population.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Geriatrics, 2020 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geriatrics and Gerontology

Geriatrics and GerontologyMedicine