PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The American Journal of Medicine· 2015Q1

Nutritional, Physical, Cognitive, and Combination Interventions and Frailty Reversal Among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Tze Pin Ng, Liang Feng, Ma Shwe Zin Nyunt, Lei Feng et al.

Short summary

A 6-month intervention combining nutritional, physical, and cognitive training reversed frailty in 47.8% of older adults, significantly more than control (15%) or single interventions (29.8%-40.5%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Combination intervention reversed frailty in 47.8% of participants over 12 months.
  • Single interventions (nutritional, cognitive, physical) reversed frailty in 29.8% to 40.5% of participants.
  • Control group showed a 15% frailty reversal rate.
  • Benefits were evident at 3 and 6 months and persisted to 12 months.
  • Improvements were seen in knee strength, gait speed, physical activity, and energy levels.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is important to establish whether frailty among older individuals is reversible with nutritional, physical, or cognitive interventions, singly or in combination. We compared the effects of 6-month-duration interventions with nutritional supplementation, physical training, cognitive training, and combination treatment vs control in reducing frailty among community-dwelling prefrail and frail older persons. METHODS: We conducted a parallel group, randomized controlled trial in community-living prefrail and frail old adults in Singapore. The participants' mean age was 70.0 years, and 61.4% (n = 151) were female. Five different 6-month interventions included nutritional supplementation (n = 49), cognitive training (n = 50), physical training (n = 48), combination treatment (n = 49), and usual care control (n = 50). Frailty score, body mass index, knee extension strength, gait speed, energy/vitality, and physical activity levels and secondary outcomes (activities of daily living dependency, hospitalization, and falls) were assessed at 0 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: Frailty score and status over 12 months were reduced in all groups, including control (15%), but were significantly higher (35.6% to 47.8%) in the nutritional (odds ratio [OR] 2.98), cognition (OR 2.89), and physical (OR 4.05) and combination (OR 5.00) intervention groups. Beneficial effects were observed at 3 months and 6 months, and persisted at 12 months. Improvements in physical frailty domains (associated with interventions) were most evident for knee strength (physical, cognitive, and combination treatment), physical activity (nutritional intervention), gait speed (physical intervention), and energy (combination intervention). There were no major differences with respect to the small numbers of secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Physical, nutritional, and cognitive interventional approaches were effective in reversing frailty among community-living older persons.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The American Journal of Medicine, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geriatrics and Gerontology

Geriatrics and GerontologyMedicine