PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Nature Medicine· 2021Q1

Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations

Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, Haoran Zhang, Matthew B. A. McDermott, Irene Y. Chen et al.

Short summary

AI algorithms for chest X-ray pathology classification consistently underdiagnose under-served patient populations, with higher rates for intersectional groups like Hispanic female patients.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • AI classifiers for chest X-ray pathology underdiagnose under-served patient populations.
  • Underdiagnosis rates are higher for intersectional under-served subpopulations (e.g., Hispanic female patients).
  • This bias risks exacerbating existing healthcare disparities and unequal access to medical treatment.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have increasingly achieved expert-level performance in medical imaging applications. However, there is growing concern that such AI systems may reflect and amplify human bias, and reduce the quality of their performance in historically under-served populations such as female patients, Black patients, or patients of low socioeconomic status. Such biases are especially troubling in the context of underdiagnosis, whereby the AI algorithm would inaccurately label an individual with a disease as healthy, potentially delaying access to care. Here, we examine algorithmic underdiagnosis in chest X-ray pathology classification across three large chest X-ray datasets, as well as one multi-source dataset. We find that classifiers produced using state-of-the-art computer vision techniques consistently and selectively underdiagnosed under-served patient populations and that the underdiagnosis rate was higher for intersectional under-served subpopulations, for example, Hispanic female patients. Deployment of AI systems using medical imaging for disease diagnosis with such biases risks exacerbation of existing care biases and can potentially lead to unequal access to medical treatment, thereby raising ethical concerns for the use of these models in the clinic.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Nature Medicine, 2021 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Health Informatics

Health InformaticsMedicine