Blood· 2016Q1
The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia
- 10,237citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia incorporates new biomarker data from gene expression analysis and next-generation sequencing.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The 2016 WHO classification for myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia is a revision, not a complete overhaul.
- New biomarker data from gene expression analysis and next-generation sequencing are incorporated.
- The updates aim to improve diagnostic criteria and prognostic relevance.
- The revision reflects a consensus among multiple medical specialties.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues was last updated in 2008. Since then, there have been numerous advances in the identification of unique biomarkers associated with some myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias, largely derived from gene expression analysis and next-generation sequencing that can significantly improve the diagnostic criteria as well as the prognostic relevance of entities currently included in the WHO classification and that also suggest new entities that should be added. Therefore, there is a clear need for a revision to the current classification. The revisions to the categories of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia will be published in a monograph in 2016 and reflect a consensus of opinion of hematopathologists, hematologists, oncologists, and geneticists. The 2016 edition represents a revision of the prior classification rather than an entirely new classification and attempts to incorporate new clinical, prognostic, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic data that have emerged since the last edition. The major changes in the classification and their rationale are presented here.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Blood, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Hematology
HematologyMedicine