Results in Materials· 2026Q2
Pitting susceptibility of 316L stainless steel manufactured via LPBF: A 2k factorial design approach
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) manufactured 316L stainless steel shows significantly higher pitting resistance (average E_pit ≈ 518 mV) compared to wrought 316L (average E_pit ≈ 37 mV), despite being more sensitive to aggressive chloride and thermal conditions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- LPBF 316L exhibits significantly higher pitting resistance (E_pit ≈ 518 mV) than wrought 316L (E_pit ≈ 37 mV).
- Increasing NaCl concentration and temperature reduces pitting resistance in both materials.
- Temperature has a stronger negative effect on pitting resistance than NaCl concentration.
- LPBF 316L is more sensitive to aggressive chloride and thermal conditions than wrought 316L.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The influence of additive manufacturing (AM) on the pitting corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel remains disputed, with conflicting reports attributing differences to porosity and microstructural heterogeneities. In this work, the pitting susceptibility of 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion (AM 316L) and wrought (W) 316L was systematically assessed using a 2 3 factorial design of experiments, a first for this problem. Pitting potential (E pit ) measured by potentiodynamic polarization, was used as the performance metric, while NaCl concentration and temperature were varied as environmental factors. AM 316L exhibited markedly higher resistance, with an average E pit ≈ 518 mV, compared to ≈ 37 mV for W 316L. Increasing the NaCl concentration and temperature reduced E pit in both materials, with temperature exerting a more potent effect. Interactive effects revealed that AM 316L was more sensitive to these environmental factors than W 316L, a previously unreported observation. The results provide statistically robust evidence that AM enhances baseline pitting resistance of 316L. However, it also highlights the increased vulnerability of AM microstructures under aggressive chloride and thermal conditions.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Results in Materials, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Metals and Alloys
Metals and AlloysMaterials Science