PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Blood· 2017Q1

Enasidenib in mutant IDH2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Eytan M. Stein, Courtney D. DiNardo, Daniel A. Pollyea, Amir T. Fathi et al.

Short summary

Enasidenib, at 100 mg daily, achieved a 40.3% overall response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with a median response duration of 5.8 months.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Enasidenib (100 mg daily) demonstrated a 40.3% overall response rate in relapsed/refractory AML patients.
  • Median response duration was 5.8 months, and median overall survival was 9.3 months.
  • Responses were driven by cellular differentiation and maturation, not aplasia.
  • Common Grade 3-4 adverse events included indirect hyperbilirubinemia (12%) and differentiation syndrome (7%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

advanced myeloid malignancies. We assessed safety outcomes for all patients and clinical efficacy in the largest patient subgroup, those with relapsed or refractory AML, from the phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion phases of the study. In the dose-escalation phase, an MTD was not reached at doses ranging from 50 to 650 mg per day. Enasidenib 100 mg once daily was selected for the expansion phase on the basis of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and demonstrated efficacy. Grade 3 to 4 enasidenib-related adverse events included indirect hyperbilirubinemia (12%) and IDH-inhibitor-associated differentiation syndrome (7%). Among patients with relapsed or refractory AML, overall response rate was 40.3%, with a median response duration of 5.8 months. Responses were associated with cellular differentiation and maturation, typically without evidence of aplasia. Median overall survival among relapsed/refractory patients was 9.3 months, and for the 34 patients (19.3%) who attained complete remission, overall survival was 19.7 months. Continuous daily enasidenib treatment was generally well tolerated and induced hematologic responses in patients for whom prior AML therapy had failed. Inducing differentiation of myeloblasts, not cytotoxicity, seems to drive the clinical efficacy of enasidenib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01915498.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Blood, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hematology

HematologyMedicine