PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer· 2026Q1

A physics-corrected ML/DL framework for heat flux field prediction in porous structure of sintered Ag

Jun-Hyeong Yoon, Minki Kim, Hyun-Soon Park, Min-Su Kim

Short summary

A physics-corrected ML/DL framework accurately predicts heat flux fields in sintered Ag microstructures 130x faster than FEA, achieving R² of 0.9898 and 1.20% ETC error on real samples.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Developed a physics-corrected ML/DL framework for rapid heat flux field prediction in sintered Ag.
  • U-Net model trained on 691 real microstructures with height normalization achieved field R² = 0.9898 and ETC error = 1.20% on held-out samples.
  • Normalization significantly improved field R² from 0.0933 to 0.9852 and reduced ETC error from 30.39% to 1.73% on aspect-ratio crops.
  • The complete pipeline predicts heat flux fields in 176.4 ms per sample, ~130x faster than FEA.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Sintered Ag is a promising die-attach material for wide-bandgap power modules, but residual pores produce spatially non-uniform heat transport that is not captured by scalar effective thermal conductivity (ETC) alone. We develop a physics-corrected machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL) framework for rapid prediction of vertical heat-flux fields from sintered-Ag cross-sections. A U-Net is trained on 691 of 867 real microstructures using a height-normalized target, q* = qH/ΔT, to remove the deterministic dependence of heat-flux magnitude on image height. An independent XGBoost model predicts ETC from normalized microstructural descriptors, and a row-wise correction enforces cross-sectional heat-flow conservation. The normalized U-Net retains high accuracy on 88 held-out real samples (field R² = 0.9898; ETC error = 1.20%). On 616 held-out aspect-ratio crops, normalization improves field R² from 0.0933 to 0.9852, reduces ETC error from 30.39% to 1.73%, and changes the geometry-dependent log-log slope from −0.9661 to −0.0077. On 320 unseen synthetic realizations, Raw / Normalized / + ML / + row-wise field R² values are −0.4291 / 0.7820 / 0.8117 / 0.8742, with ETC errors of 60.61 / 12.74 / 6.49 / 6.49%. The complete pipeline requires 176.4 ms per sample, approximately 130 times faster than finite element analysis (FEA). The resulting regime-level gating rule is explicit: use height normalization for geometry shift, apply ETC scaling only when the independent scalar predictor is more accurate than the ETC implied by the field, and use row-wise conservation to redistribute flux without altering the scalar ETC.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Computational Mechanics

Computational MechanicsEngineering