PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2017Q1

Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Hemophilia A with Inhibitors

Johannes Oldenburg, Johnny Mahlangu, Benjamin Kim, Christophe Schmitt et al.

Short summary

Once-weekly subcutaneous emicizumab prophylaxis reduced annualized bleeding rates by 87% (2.9 vs. 23.3 events) in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors compared to no prophylaxis.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Emicizumab prophylaxis reduced annualized bleeding rates by 87% in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors compared to no prophylaxis (2.9 vs. 23.3 events).
  • 63% of patients on emicizumab prophylaxis experienced zero bleeding events, compared to 6% in the no-prophylaxis group.
  • Emicizumab prophylaxis reduced bleeding rates by 79% compared to previous bypassing-agent prophylaxis in a separate group of patients.
  • Injection-site reactions were the most common adverse event (15%); rare thrombotic events occurred in patients also receiving bypassing agents.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emicizumab (ACE910) bridges activated factor IX and factor X to restore the function of activated factor VIII, which is deficient in persons with hemophilia A. This phase 3, multicenter trial assessed once-weekly subcutaneous emicizumab prophylaxis in persons with hemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors. METHODS: We enrolled participants who were 12 years of age or older. Those who had previously received episodic treatment with bypassing agents were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to emicizumab prophylaxis (group A) or no prophylaxis (group B). The primary end point was the difference in bleeding rates between group A and group B. Participants who had previously received prophylactic treatment with bypassing agents received emicizumab prophylaxis in group C. RESULTS: A total of 109 male participants with hemophilia A with inhibitors were enrolled. The annualized bleeding rate was 2.9 events (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 5.0) among participants who were randomly assigned to emicizumab prophylaxis (group A, 35 participants) versus 23.3 events (95% CI, 12.3 to 43.9) among those assigned to no prophylaxis (group B, 18 participants), representing a significant difference of 87% in favor of emicizumab prophylaxis (P<0.001). A total of 22 participants in group A (63%) had zero bleeding events, as compared with 1 participant (6%) in group B. Among 24 participants in group C who had participated in a noninterventional study, emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in a bleeding rate that was significantly lower by 79% than the rate with previous bypassing-agent prophylaxis (P<0.001). Overall, 198 adverse events were reported in 103 participants receiving emicizumab prophylaxis; the most frequent events were injection-site reactions (in 15% of participants). Thrombotic microangiopathy and thrombosis were reported in 2 participants each (in the primary analysis) who had received multiple infusions of activated prothrombin complex concentrate for breakthrough bleeding. No antidrug antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Emicizumab prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower rate of bleeding events than no prophylaxis among participants with hemophilia A with inhibitors. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche and Chugai Pharmaceutical; HAVEN 1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02622321 .).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hematology

HematologyMedicine